Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Mishkin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1986No. 82 Civ. 8753 (DNE)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EDELSTEIN, District Judge:

This is a class action alleging securities fraud, common law fraud and a pattern of racketeering activity. Plaintiffs allege that defendant Steven A. Mishkin (“Mishkin”) and others engineered an intricate investment fraud, involving numerous investment trusts and several corporations. On March 2, 1984, plaintiffs’ attorneys sought leave to apply for an order, pursuant to Rule 23(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, prohibiting defendant Mishkin, his attorneys, agents or employees from communicating, directly or indirectly, with members of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. In Re RMJSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. In Re School Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API