Legal Opinion

Robin v. Doctors Officenters Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 14, 1988No. Nos. 84 C 10798, 85 C 8913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CONLON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs purchased common stock of defendant Doctors Officenters Corporation *580(“DOC”) in a public offering in December 1983. They claim to have relied on a prospectus that contained omissions and misrepresentations of material fact. In 84 C 10798, plaintiffs sued DOC, FMP (a medical partnership that owned DOC stock) and six directors and officers of DOC. In 85 C 8913, plaintiffs sued the law firm of Katten, Muchin & Zavis (“Katten, Muchin”) (DOC’s counsel in the public offering) together with six officers and directors of DOC.

On January 28,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Pedro Gonzales v. Clifton W. Cassidy, Jr., John Richard Hayes, Iii, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Synthroid Marketing LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  2. Scholes v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Tribco Construction Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API