In re Synthroid Marketing Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, third party payers, sued the defendants, Knoll Pharmaceutical Co. [“Knoll”], BASF Corporation [“BASF”], Boots Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [“Boots”], and individual defendants alleging federal and state claims relating to the marketing and sale of the drug Synthroid. The plaintiffs move to certify a class of all insurance providers and other third party payers, including self-funded plans but excluding governmental agencies, that paid Synthroid expenses incurred by any consumer in the United States and Puerto Rico from January 1,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.