Legal Opinion

In re Synthroid Marketing Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 19, 1999No. 97 C 6017; MDL No. 1182PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, third party payers, sued the defendants, Knoll Pharmaceutical Co. [“Knoll”], BASF Corporation [“BASF”], Boots Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [“Boots”], and individual defendants alleging federal and state claims relating to the marketing and sale of the drug Synthroid. The plaintiffs move to certify a class of all insurance providers and other third party payers, including self-funded plans but excluding governmental agencies, that paid Synthroid expenses incurred by any consumer in the United States and Puerto Rico from January 1,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API