Legal Opinion

Roach v. Harmonia Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 3, 1933No. 31886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Nieel, C. J.

This is a suit on a fire insurance policy for $2,000 on household furniture and effects. The plaintiff claimed also the statutory penalty of 12 per cent, damages, and $750 as a reasonable attorney’s fee, under section 3 of Act' No. 16S of 1908. The defendant, answering the suit, denied virtually every allegation in the plaintiff’s petition, except the fact that the policy was issued, and set up two special pleas in defense of the suit. The special pleas were, first, that the property was incumbered by a chattel mortgage at the time of the fire, and, second, that the plaintiff misrepresented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Hart v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. Federico MacAroni Mfg. v. Great Western Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Knowles v. Dixie Fire Ins. Co. of Greensboro, N.C.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Darvie v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE CO. OF FLA.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Godfrey v. Security Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Peterson v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API