Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1933No. 14572PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTERFIELD, Judge.
This is a suit on a policy of fire insurance covering household effects. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this appeal.
Joseph Peterson, plaintiff herein, obtained a policy of fire insurance from the defendant corporation on January 6, 1932. The policy was issued without any formal application blank having been executed or any inquiry made concerning the incumbrance of the. household effects, the subject of the insurance. A little more than one month later all of the property insured by the policy was destroyed by fire. An adjuster of the defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Corporation of Roman Catholic Church v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Webster v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Sullivan v. Mercantile Town Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Shuff v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Gitz Sash Factory, Inc. v. Union Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Brandon Forvendel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2018
- Brough v. Presidential Fire Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Creem v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1936