Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Thompson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1985No. C9-67-39495PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

T. Eugene Thompson has petitioned for reinstatement to the practice of law pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility. The Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board investigated the petition and recommended that the petition be denied. A public evidentiary hearing was held by a panel of the Board on September 20, 1984. The panel also recommended that the reinstatement petition be denied. We adopt the panel’s recommendation and deny the petition.

The petitioner was licensed to practice law in Minnesota on October 4, 1955. On December 6,1963, he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Application of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. In re SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. In Re Application for Discipline of ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re DortchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re CulpepperDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
  5. In re Reinstatement of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API