Legal Opinion
Patrice v. Murphy
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1998No. 66568-1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The United States District Court, Western District of Washington, certified the following question under RCW 2.60:
Whereas RCW 2.42.120, pertaining to “Interpreters in Legal Proceedings” involving the hearing impaired, was added by way of House amendment to Senate Bill No. 4155 (and ultimately enacted as § 12 of Ch. 389 of the Laws of 1985), and whereas the stated subject matter of Senate Bill No. 4155 pertained to “Changing the Definition of Court Costs a Convicted Defendant may be Required to Pay,” and whereas the title of Senate Bill No. 4155 as enacted was ordered to stand as “An Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Duffy v. RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Citizens v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- STATE EX REL.(CAT) v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Pierce County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.