Legal Opinion
In Re Grievance of Merrill
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 16, 1988No. 86-391PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
The State appeals from a decision of the Vermont Labor Relations Board (Board) holding that the State acted without just cause in dismissing Darwin Merrill (grievant), who was employed by the Office of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs (OADAP) as the director of a project for Countermeasures Related to Alcohol and Safety on the Highways (CRASH). We affirm.
I
Grievant was employed by OADAP as the director of Project CRASH from 1970 until his dismissal on October 5, 1984. The State seems to have had no significant difficulties with grievant’s work until a new supervisor became grievant’s immediate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re Grievance of BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- In Re Grievance of MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- In Re Grievance of YoungSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- In Re Grievance of GageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Grievance of TowleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation, AFT Local 3180 v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Grievance of McCortSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- In Re LillySupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re Grievance of HurlburtSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.