Legal Opinion

Ester v. City of Monmouth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1995No. OTC 3528; SC S41529PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

Petitioner brought this claim against respondent, the City of Monmouth (the city), arguing that the city exceeded the property tax limitations prescribed by Article XI, section lib, of the Oregon Constitution, 1 when it imposed a special assessment upon petitioner for street and sidewalk improvements to the street running in front of property owned by petitioner. This case comes before us upon review of the Tax Court’s order granting the city’s motion for summary judgment.

Petitioner owns two adjacent lots in the city that contain a total of 10 residential units. In 1992, the city voters…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Flavorland Foods v. Washington County AssessorOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Central PointOregon Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API