Legal Opinion
Hoelzel v. Gavalas
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 10, 1947PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J okeph L., 0. C. J.
This matter was a suit on two bills of exchange wherein the defendants, among other defenses, claimed certain credits by way of set-off. The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff.
Certain credits, as claimed by the defendants, were allowed as a set-off. The question of interest was reserved by consent of counsel at the trial, for determination by the court. The specific questions now to be decided by the court are: (1) Ts this such a liquidated debt as to bear interest in view of *192the credits allowed by the jury? (2) If so, for what period of time should…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- John Agnew Co. v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
- J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Healy v. FallonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Loomis v. GillettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Jardine Estates, Inc. v. Donna Brook Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Kastal v. Hickory House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1963
- Speed v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1955
- Thorp v. American Aviation and General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.