Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. of McGrath v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 1, 1966No. Civ-1013-PctPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, District Judge.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint was heard by the Court, and leave was granted to both parties to submit supplemental memoranda. Such memoranda having been submitted, the Court is now fully advised, and hereby orders that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted.

The plaintiffs filed their complaint on July 14, 1965, for amounts relating to labor furnished defendant’s principal prior to October 1, 1963. Plaintiffs sue upon the basis of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq. Defendant contends that the complaint is not timely, because it was not filed within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. General Electric Co. v. Southern Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964
  2. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1965
  3. United States v. Southern Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States Ex Rel. JB Systems/Atlanta v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API