Legal Opinion

United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 24, 1984No. 83-5328PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Aetna Drywall Contractors, Inc., brought this suit against Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and Renel Construction, Inc., for damages sustained by Aetna Drywall in connection with work performed on the Federal Building and Courthouse in Fort Lauderdale under a subcontract with Renel. At the close of Aetna Drywall’s case, the district judge granted a directed verdict because Aetna Drywall: (1) failed to apportion damages, (2) failed to file the lawsuit within the period of the statute of limitations, and (3) failed to plead or prove estop-pel. We reverse because the district judge erroneously…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Electric Company v. Southern Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States ex rel. Gray-Bar Electric Co. v. J. H. Copeland & Sons Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States Ex Rel. of McGrath v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API