Legal Opinion

Allen v. Roufs

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for labor performed in constructing a house and garage on the east half of lots 45, 46, 47, and 48, in block 11, St. Francis Park, Klamath Falls, Oregon. From a decree dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff was employed by the defendant H. E. Roufs who was in possession of the property in question under a contract to purchase from Geo. S. Rusco. The work was completed on August 13, 1931, and on the same day plaintiff filed his notice of lien, claiming that the sum of $460.80 “is now due” and that “the above statement is a true and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capital Lumbering Co. v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Henry v. HandOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Schneider v. KolthoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Wade v. ReitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Borkstrom v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleshman v. WhitesideOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n of Santa Fe v. FidelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Rutherford v. MakiDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API