Alvez v. Toprahanian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action on a promissory note. The complaint, as filed, named as plaintiff in the caption “F. J. Gianola, Guardian' of the Estates of Mary Alvez, Marguerite Alvez and Joaquin Alvez, Minors”. Paragraph I of the complaint alleged that F. J. Gianola was, by an order duly given, made and entered on a certain date, appointed guardian of the estates of these minors, giving their names, and that ever since said date he has been and now is, the duly appointed, qualified and acting guardian of the estates of said minors. Paragraph II set forth a copy of the note in question, which was payable…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Sterrett v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Reardon v. Balaklala Corsol. Copper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1912
- Dubbers v. GouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Fox v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. Palmer CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Plumlee v. PoagCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Renner v. Pennsylvania RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.