Legal Opinion
United States v. Wierzchucki
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 30, 1965No. CR-64-40PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES E. DOYLE, District Judge.
Defendant has waived indictment and has pleaded not guilty to an information charging him with violating the Selective Service Act by failing to report for civilian work. Following entry of the not guilty plea, he has filed a motion for dismissal of the information. The motion is supported by affidavits by defendant and by his court-appointed counsel.
The initial question is whether the motion to dismiss, as amended, made after entry of the not guilty plea, will be considered. The record shows that, following its initial inquiry, the court had declined to appoint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Wilbert Lee SturgisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Imboden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Russell FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Lawrence Monroe Haven v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Falone AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. KnudsenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1971
- United States v. Russell FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968