Legal Opinion

United States v. Bank of Clarksdale, of the Estate of Mae Suddoth Barr, Deceased

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1965No. 21443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves income taxes for the year 1959. The bank, in its representative capacity, paid the tax, after assessment, and sued for refund after claim for refund was denied. The District Court ruled for the taxpayer and the government appeals. 1 See Bank of Clarksdale, Executor of the Estate of Mae Suddoth Barr, Deceased, N.D.Miss., 1963, 224 F.Supp. 698.

The question presented turns on the basis to be used in computing gain realized on the sale of real property. Mr. and Mrs. Barr executed a joint will in 1932. They were residents of Mississippi. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Andrews v. BrumfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Selig v. TrostMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  4. McClelland v. Bank of ClarksdaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Spiva v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alonzo Wimberly Jenkins, Jr., as Executors Under the Will of Martha O. Jenkins, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Keeter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Cyrus Q. Stewart, Jr., and William L. Stewart, as Executors of the Will of Mildred L. Stewart, Deceased v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Potter v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1967
  5. Estate of Bagley v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API