Legal Opinion

McClelland v. Bank of Clarksdale

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1960No. 41441PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

A petition was filed for construction of a will jointly executed by husband and wife. The husband predeceas ed Ms wife, and the bequests and devises by the husband gave his wife a life estate with unlimited power of disposition, with a remainder in named takers. She did not exercise the power. Some of the remaindermen predeceased the life tenant. The principal questions are (1) whether the unlimited power of disposition enlarged the widow’s life estate to one in fee simple, and (2) if not, whether the will created vested or contingent remainder estates in the remaindermen who predeceased the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Andrews v. BrumfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Vaughn v. VAUGHNMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kyle v. WOOD, ET UX.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Warren v. IngramMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Baumgardner v. ReadyMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Martin v. Humble Oil and Refining CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1960
  3. United States v. Bank of Clarksdale, of the Estate of Mae Suddoth Barr, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Lane v. Woodland Hills Baptist ChurchMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Bank of Clarksdale v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API