Legal Opinion

Kieger v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1943No. 33,535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

This is an action to recover for injuries and other damages sustained by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligence of defendants. Before the case was assigned for trial, plaintiff’s counsel appeared specially and challenged and “moved to quash” the entire panel of jurors selected for that term of court, upon the ground that said panel had been called in violation of the constitutional and statutory provisions relative thereto. Subsequently, when the case was assigned for trial, plaintiff again challenged and “moved to quash” the entire panel and further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruddy v. IngebretSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Fox v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Gillson v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Adams v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Staloch v. BelsaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Hall v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API