Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Ivory

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1940No. Appeals, 62-66PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

These appeals, taken under the provisions of section 1 of the Act of March 5,1925, P. L. 23, are from an order of the court below determining that it has jurisdiction over the cause of action in a proceeding for the partition of several parcels of real estate, instituted by Elinor Ivory McCabe, appellee. The appeal at No. 62 is taken by all the appellants jointly and for that reason is bad; the appeals at Nos. 63, 64, 65, and 66 are taken by four of the appellants, severally, solely for the purpose of protecting themselves “from danger of inadvertently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Grime v. Department of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Skelton v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Main Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. Columbia Super Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Nippon Ki-Ito Kaisha, Ltd. v. Ewing-Thomas Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Wilson v. GarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zerbe Township School District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Matthews v. Plum Twp. School Dist.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Sellers v. HanrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Washcalus AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Norman Ackerman, Esquire v. Huston (In re J & B Delivery Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API