Legal Opinion

State v. Westergren

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 20, 1986No. 13-86-010-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Relator, through the District Attorney, ' requests this Court to issue a writ of mandamus requiring the Honorable Mike West-ergren, Presiding Judge of the 214th District Court, to vacate a judgment of acquittal entered for the defendant in Cause No. 84-CR-892-F, The State of Texas v. Margaret Covington. After careful consideration, we deny the request.

We first face the question of our jurisdiction to issue such a writ. The TEX. CONST, art. V, § 6, and TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221 (Vernon Supp.1986) authorize this Court to issue writs of mandamus in criminal cases. Wolff v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. State v. Meyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. State v. Savage, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
  4. Mattiza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API