Mattiza v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of the felony offense of theft from a person. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and, after a jury trial, was found guilty as charged in the indictment. The jury assessed punishment at six years in the Texas Department of Corrections, probated, and a $6,000 fine. In two related points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict and that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of theft from a person. We affirm.
On March 9, 1989, the Internal Affairs Division…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Penagraph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Stum v. StumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Arizmendez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Jim Jack Thompson, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.