Legal Opinion

Mattiza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1990No. B14-89-992-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the felony offense of theft from a person. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and, after a jury trial, was found guilty as charged in the indictment. The jury assessed punishment at six years in the Texas Department of Corrections, probated, and a $6,000 fine. In two related points of error, appellant complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict and that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of theft from a person. We affirm.

On March 9, 1989, the Internal Affairs Division…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Penagraph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Stum v. StumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Arizmendez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. State v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jim Jack Thompson, III v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API