Legal Opinion

Herrman v. Dixon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1956No. 7433PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

This case was submitted under an agreed statement. After proper notice the plaintiffs, now respondents, filed their mechanic’s lien statement in the office of the circuit clerk of Jasper County on March 1, 1954. On Tuesday, June 1, 1954, they filed their petition seeking judgment to enforce such lien. The mechanic’s lien statute, sec. 429.170,* provides that all actions for mechanic’s liens shall be commenced within *717ninety days after the filing of the lien; and no lien shall continue to exist for more than ninety days after the lien shall be filed unless an action shall be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Wentz v. Price Candy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Fawkes v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Jones v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Stock v. SchlomanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Piselli v. 75th Street MedicalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. R. L. W. v. BillingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Westerhold v. Mullenix Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. ASSOCIATED GROCERS'COMPANY OF ST. LOUIS, MO. v. CroweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API