Legal Opinion

Ludlum v. Pinckard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1922No. 14149PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiff in error by her bill for foreclosure against defendant in error and her husband, who is now deceased, secured a decree of sale of the mortgaged property. By the decree approving the master's report of sale a deficiency judgment was entered against the defendant in error. On appeal to the Appellate Court the decree of the superior court was reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to that court to vacate that part of the decree providing for a deficiency judgment, and the cause comes here by writ of certiorari on the petition of plaintiff in error, who was complainant in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DearbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Blass v. . TerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Gold v. OgdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McFarland v. MelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Lourdes Guerrero v. Howard BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Beaver v. LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Wilson v. MundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  5. Zamis v. HansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API