Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Melson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 13, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action at law to recover about $9,300 principal, with interest and attorney's fee in addition, balance due on certain mortgage notes, the foreclosure sale under the two deeds of trust securing them having fallen that much short of paying the full mortgage debt. The plaintiff's intestate was the payee and mortgagee and T.V. Schoonover and wife were the makers and mortgagors. About a week after the execution of the notes and deeds of trust they sold the mortgaged land to the defendants, Messrs. Melson and Hoyt, by general warranty deed expressly reciting the conveyance was subject to the deeds…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Elliott v. SackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Bensieck v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Citizens Bank of Senath v. DouglassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Chaffee v. HawkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morris v. HollandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Carter v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Hoyt v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. Hulin v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. The Simms Co. v. WOLVERTONOregon Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API