Gold v. Ogden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This action was brought upon a covenant in a conveyance from one Flint to defendant by the terms of which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay plaintiffs’ mortgage on the premises.
The undisputed evidence is that, in 1889, Flint and one Warner made an exchange of properties. Among the properties received by Warner was a tract upon which was a mortgage to plaintiffs for the payment of which Flint was personally liable. Warner, for purposes of his own, caused the conveyance to be made to defendant. This conveyance contained the assumption clause above referred to. The deed was delivered to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Rogers v. CastleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beeson v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Nissen v. SabinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Hansen v. ProctorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Ludlum v. PinckardIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Becker v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.