Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. And Subsidiaries, F/k/a Trinova Corp. And Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 21, 2004No. 01-2741Published

1DissentClay, Circuit Judge

The majority overstates the level of deference revenue, rulings receive. The Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Mead, 533 U.S. 218, 121 S.Ct. 2164, 150 L.Ed.2d 292 (2001), compels me to respectfully dissent. New circuit precedents, in Omohundro v. United States, 300 F.3d 1065 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam), U.S. Freightways Corp. v. Commissioner, 270 F.3d 1137 (7th Cir.2001), and American Express Co. v. United States, 262 F.3d 1376 (Fed.Cir.2001), are cited by the majority to temper the impact of Mead. But as discussed below, these cases do not diminish Mead nearly to the extent that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API