Legal Opinion

Shaughnessy v. Diamond Iron Works

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1926No. 25,227PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Certiorari to review the decision of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation to Charles Shaughnessy for the loss of an eye.

The claimant is a machinist employed by the Diamond Iron Works. In December, 1922, while operating a lathe, a small piece of steel struck his right eye and injured it to such an extent as to cause “industrial” blindness in that eye. He was paid full compensation for the loss of the sight of the eye by the insurer. On January 3, 1925, while working at the same machine for the same employer, who still had the same insurer, a small particle of metal or emery dust…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garwin v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Mosgaard v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Hessley v. Minneapolis Steel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Warhelm v. Melrose Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  3. Bata Shoe Co. v. ChvojanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. McKenzie v. Gulf Hills Hotel, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Ass'nPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API