Legal Opinion

Mosgaard v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1924No. 24,302PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Certiorari to review an award of compensation made by the Industrial Commission.

The sole question to be determined may be thus stated: When, in the course of his employment, an accidental injury to a workmen’s eye necessitates its removal, does the workman, totally blind in that eye since childhood, become entitled to compensation as provided by the following portion of section 14, chapter 82, p. 96, L. 1921, “For the loss of an eye, sixty-six and two-thirds per centum of the daily wage at the time of injury during one hundred (100) weeks”?

A new phase of the subject .of compensation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madera Sugar Pine Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Garwin v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Hessley v. Minneapolis Steel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dimon v. DimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Iacone v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Blair v. Armour and CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Haas v. Globe Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Kraushar v. Cummins Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API