Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Pilot Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 17, 1982No. CA 81-187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of Pilot Life Insurance Company (Pilot) and Vertac, Inc. (Vertac).1 Appellant, Raymond Atkins (Atkins), was employed by Vertac and in November, 1976, was hospitalized for a lung problem. During his medical treatment, he also developed a brain abscess. Atkins filed a Workers’ Compensation claim, contending both the lung and brain abscess problems were compensable. Vertac denied that either problem was work-related, but on December 20, 1977, Atkins and Vertac submitted a joint petition to the Workers’ Compensation Commission,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Aetna Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. North Kansas City Memorial Hospital v. WileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. O'Bar v. MFA Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. BocanegraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Life Insurance v. HeslipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Lively v. Libbey Memorial Physical Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Starrett v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API