Legal Opinion

O'Bar v. MFA Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 1982No. 81-209PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The only issue on appeal is whether a reduction clause in an automobile insurance policy that provides for $5,000 in accidental death benefits is void because it violates public policy. The trial court held that the clause which reduced payment by any amounts paid under workers’ compensation law was valid. We disagree and find such a provision void as against public policy.

The appellant’s husband, Jeweral Wayne O’Bar, was killed in a vehicle accident while driving his employer’s truck. His widow, Reba Faye O’Bar, the appellant, and his child received over $5,000 for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aetna Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. State Auto Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Sproles v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. PettieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Elam v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Ronald D. Nichols v. Nancy Anderson, Canal Insurance Company, Garnishee-Appellee. Allstate Insurance Company v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API