Legal Opinion
Curtis Weinstein v. James L. Schwartz, Michael Weinstein, and Lissa Weinstein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 1, 2005No. 04-2936PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Herbert Weinstein, the founder of Parsons Tanning Company, transferred all of the company stock to his four children in equal shares. A dispute arose among the siblings over whether to sell a farm that the company owned. Curtis Weinstein, who opposed the sale, sued for a declaratory judgment that his brother and sister, Michael and Lissa, do not own the shares they pledged as collateral for a loan. The District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judg-. ment in favor of Michael and Lissa, as well as in favor of company attorney James Schwartz on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Marvin BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Colleen P. Kramer v. Banc of America Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Wayne Edwards v. Donald N. Snyder, Jr., Director, Michael L. Holmes, Allan WiselyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Deidre Davis v. Yolanda CarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Haxhiu v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Carolyn G. Kochert v. Adagen Medical International, Incorporated and North American Medical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Bobbie Jo Scholz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.