Legal Opinion

Bain v. Graber

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 30, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Chief

Justice Ratliff—

Affirming.

George Graber, plaintiff below, brought tbis suit to recover of T. M. Bain, defendant below, for certain pipes or casing left on tbe premises of tbe landowner, after tbe lessee bad eeased drilling and left tbe premises. Tbe trial resulted in a jury verdict and judgment tbereon in favor'of tbe plaintiff for tbe sum of $500. Defendant bas appealed from that judgment insisting on a reversal on tbe grounds that tbe amount found for tbe plaintiff is excessive; tbe verdict is not sustained by tbe evidence; and that tbe instructions were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  2. Patton v. WoodrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Kentucky Block Cannel Coal Co. v. StacyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Bertram v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garr-Woolley v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Hoing v. River Valley Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Davis v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955
  5. Nally v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API