Cox v. Burgess
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 91.—ACTION BY H. E. BURGESS AGAINST GEORGE I. COX FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF A CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF LAND. Appeal from Pike Circuit Court. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge O’Rear
Affirming.
*700Appellee owned the land across and on both sides the mouth of Long Pork of Millers Creek in Pike county, extending from the side of the mountain on the side of the branch, to the side of the mountain on the other side of the branch. Appellant owned a larger boundary, about 1,000 acres, adjoining appellee’s, but' lying further up the branch, and on each side of appellee’s land. The situation was such that to haul out of appellant’s land it was necessary to cross appellee.’s farm, or to cross the mountains. The latter was impracticable, so that the…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Barquin v. Hall Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Carroll Gas & Oil Co. v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Swiss Oil Corp. v. RiggsbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Laskey v. L. & L. Manchester Drive-In, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.