Legal Opinion

(PC) Ramnanan v. Holmes

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 20, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01113Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE RAMNANAN, No. 2:21-cv-1113 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HOLMES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and paid the filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the 20 court. As set forth below, plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. 21 Screening…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API