Schmolt v. Nagel
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Brooke, J. Bill by Rudolph Schmolt and others to enjoin Ludwig Nagel and others, trustees, from closing an alley. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Complainants and defendants own all the property in block 29, James Campau subdivision, city of Detroit. This block is bounded on the north by Scott street, on the east by Chene street, on the south by Pierce street, and on the west by Dubois street. According to the original plat there was an alley in said block running north and south parallel to Chene street and 100 feet west therefrom, and another alley of the same width in the center of the block running from said north and south alley westerly to Dubois street. Defendants own all the property fronting on Chene street and also a lot…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Horton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Bauman v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phelps v. Stott Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Michigan Central Railway Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Kirby Terminal Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Forster v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.