Legal Opinion
In Re Potash Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 23, 2010No. Nos, 08 C 6910, MDL No. 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, Judge.
Before the Court are motions to dismiss from RUE PA Belaruskali (“Belaruskali”) and JSC Belarusian Potash Company (“BPC Minsk”). (R. 190, Belaruskali’s Mot. to Dismiss; R. 222, BPC Minsk’s Mot. to Dismiss.) For the reasons stated below, Belaruskali’s motion is granted and BPC Minsk’s motion is denied.
BACKGROUND 1
This Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) consists of two class actions. In the first action, the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs 2 bring suit on behalf of themselves and all others who purchased potash products in the United States directly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Killingsworth v. HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jovic v. L-3 Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Carol Sachs v. Republic of AustriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Carol Sachs v. Republic of AustriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012