Legal Opinion

University of New England v. Weinstein

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 18, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWathen, C.J.

[¶ 1] Defendant Harvey Weinstein appeals from entries of summary judgment (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) in favor of plaintiff University of New England (UNE) on UNE’s claim and Weinstein’s counterclaim. Weinstein argues that the court erred (1) in failing to consider the defenses raised in his statement of material facts in opposition to UNE’s claim for collection of two promissory notes; (2) in failing to consider his statement of material facts and affidavit on his counterclaim for breach of contract, wrongful dismissal, and denial of due process; and (3) in denying his motion to compel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. Prescott v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Rodrigue v. RodrigueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Moscone v. AndrewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  2. Rogers v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API