Legal Opinion

Moscone v. Andrews

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

The appeal in this fraud action is taken by plaintiff from a judgment for defendants on their counterclaim filed to enforce the settlement of the dispute on the terms that the parties had agreed upon during pendency of the action. In conformance with that settlement agreement, the Superi- or Court (Penobscot County, Browne, A.R.J.) entered summary judgment for defendants Philip R. Andrews, John M. Goodwin, James Otis, and a partnership known as Wabush Associates and dismissed with prejudice the complaint of plaintiff Charles E. Moscone. On Moscone’s appeal, we find no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Letellier v. SmallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Phillips v. FullerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. University of New England v. WeinsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API