Commonwealth v. Vining
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
¶ 1 The present appeals are from the judgments of sentence imposed upon Appellants, Wanda Vining and Lee Jones, following their convictions for numerous offenses stemming from the abuse of a two-and-a-half year old child who sustained injuries while in their care. Given the identical factual background and presence of common issues, resolution of both appeals can best be accomplished in a single opinion.1
¶2 The record regarding the factual background of this case reveals that on the morning of May 23, 1994, Ms. Laura Wright asked Wanda Vining and her live-in companion, Lee Jones, to baby-sit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. UderraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lynn, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.