Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vining

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 2000PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 The present appeals are from the judgments of sentence imposed upon Appellants, Wanda Vining and Lee Jones, following their convictions for numerous offenses stemming from the abuse of a two-and-a-half year old child who sustained injuries while in their care. Given the identical factual background and presence of common issues, resolution of both appeals can best be accomplished in a single opinion.1

¶2 The record regarding the factual background of this case reveals that on the morning of May 23, 1994, Ms. Laura Wright asked Wanda Vining and her live-in companion, Lee Jones, to baby-sit…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. UderraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. BryantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lynn, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API