Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Uderra

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1998No. 133 Capital Appeal DocketPublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is a direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 722(4) and 9711(h). Appellant, Jose Uderra, was convicted by a jury of one count each of murder in the first degree, robbery, possession .of an instrument of crime and criminal conspiracy. At the conclusion of the penalty phase of Appellant’s trial, the jury returned a sentence of death.

The evidence of record, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, discloses the following. At approximately 7:00 a.m. on October 18, 1991, the victim, Michael Sharpe, went to the 2900 block of North Orkney…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. HanibleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. RollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API