Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Cridelle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1942No. 29595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

Violette Cridelle, as beneficiary, brought suit against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to recover under a policy of life insurance the sum of $370 and also to recover penalty and attorney’s fees because of the alleged bad faith of the defendant in refusing to make payment as provided by the policy, which, under date of February 12, 1940, was issued to her deceased husband, Harry J. Cridelle. The defendant'pleaded in bar of recovery, except as to the return of premiums paid, a provision of the policy as follows: “When policy is incontestable and when voidable. This policy shall be…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. PattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Reliance Life Insurance v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Davis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Baum v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Grant v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API