Dan Marius Andreiu v. Janet Reno, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BEEZER; Dissent by Judge THOMAS.
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Dan Marius Andreiu moves for a stay of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) final order of removal, pending our resolution of his petition for review. The government opposes the motion because Andreiu is unable to satisfy the standard for enjoining an alien’s removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(2) (Supp. II 1996). An-dreiu argues that section 1252(f)(2) does not apply to temporary stays. A motions panel of this court requested supplemental memoranda on “the applicability, if any, of 8 U.S.C. [§] 1252(f) to petitioner’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dan Marius Andreiu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Stanley Russell Scales, Jr. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bin Weng v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Whitaker v. Baxter (In Re Whitaker)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2006
- Canter v. Canter (In re Canter)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.