State v. Sauer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Hennepin county, before Hicks, J., of assault in the second degree, and appeals from an order refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Defendant stands convicted of the crime of assault in the second degree, as defined in the fourth subdivision of section 187, Pen. Code. Upon appeal, he alleges error in rulings made by the trial court upon the admissibility of certain testimony, and, further, that the verdict is so manifestly and palpably against the evidence as to raise the presumption that it was the result of prejudice and passion. The case has been here before. 38 Minn. 438, (38 N. W. Rep. 355.)
1. The court below ruled correctly as to the admission in evidence of the conversation which occurred, immediately before the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartholomew v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- State v. SauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Shay v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. HensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- Koch v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Thompson v. Bankers Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Palmer v. Cedar Rapids & Marion Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.