Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Livestock Commission
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1947No. 8665PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
Frank Peterson on March 28, 1945, made application under Chapter 52, Laws of 1937, to the Livestock Commission for a license to operate a livestock market at Poison. Hearing was held before the commission on April 9. The hearing was informal and no record was kept of the proceedings. The application was denied on April 10th and on April 11th a letter was sent to Peterson’s attorney advising him of the action taken by the commission. The letter was as follows:
“After considering the application submitted by you in behalf of Mr. F. E. Peterson, the Livestock Commission at its meeting held April…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- State ex rel. Dybdal v. State Securities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- In Re FredericksMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Household Finance Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Cascade County Consumers Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Langen v. Badlands Cooperative State Grazing Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1951
- Vélez Quiñones v. Secretario de Instrucción PúblicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Baker Sales Barn, Inc. v. Montana Livestock CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.