Legal Opinion

People v. Zaeske

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 24, 1966No. Gen. 65-51PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Defendant, Charles Zaeske, Billy Alston and Julian Alston were indicted in Kane County for theft of a Chevrolet automobile from Ross Rambler, an auto sales lot in Elgin, Illinois. Both Alstons pleaded guilty and applied for probation. Zaeske was tried as an accessory before the fact and was found guilty by a jury.

He appeals charging that the unsupported testimony of the Alstons was insufficient to sustain a guilty verdict, that defendant was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and that prejudicial error occurred during the trial.

A proper consideration of defendant’s arguments requires…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HermensIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. The PEOPLE v. ClayIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. The People v. LadasIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schroers v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. EddingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. People v. MostafaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. People v. MinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. HolversonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API