Legal Opinion

Bendiburg v. Dempsey

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 5, 1989No. Civ. A. 1:87-CV-1774-JOFPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FORRESTER, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. These motions will be addressed following a detailed statement of the relevant facts.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS.

A. The Parties.

Plaintiff Harry D. Bendiburg brings this action both in his individual capacity as well as in his capacity as administrator of the estate of his son, Carl Austin Bendi-burg (hereinafter “Carl”). Named as defendants are (1) the Cobb County Department of Family and Children Services (hereinafter “DFACS”) and three DFACS officials, Pamela S. Dempsey,…

2Cases cited143 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bendiburg v. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Harry A. Bendiburg, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Carl Bendiburg, Deceased v. Pamela S. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Paul Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Powell v. Dept. of Human Resources of State of Ga.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
  5. Novak v. Cobb County-Kennestone Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API