Legal Opinion

GOODMAN v. INTERVET, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 6, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02926Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CATHY GOODMAN, MATTHEW INMAN, DENNIS CANETTY, BELINDA YOUNG, AND ELLEN BERRIS, on behalf of Civ. No, 2:22-ev-02926 (WJM) themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, OPINION v. INTERVET, INC. d/b/a MERCK ANIMAL HEALTH d/b/a HOME AGAIN, Defendant. In this putative class action for deceptive and misleading marketing, Defendant Intervet, Inc, d/b/a Merck Animal Health d/b/a Home Again (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ entire Amended Complaint (“AC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API