Legal Opinion

Clay v. Freeman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 26, 1886No. 677PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP MISSISSIPPI. In equity. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This case was commenced by bill in equity filed in the court below in July, 1882, by Pattie A. Clay and Brutus J. Clay, her husband, citizens of the State of Kentucky, against Lucy O. Freeman .and O. L. Freeman, her husband, and David I. Field, citizens of the State of Missouri. As the bill was dismissed on demurrer, and the appeal is from the decree of dismissal, it is necessary to state its principal allegations. The facts alleged are substantially as follows :

In 1855 Christopher I. Field, (of whom the complainant, Pattie A. Clay, is only child, and heir-at-law,) and his brother, David I.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clay v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Frank Andre v. Board of Trustees of the Village of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. Maynard v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Robert v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API