Legal Opinion

Clay v. Field

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 2, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

IN ERROR, TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. The facts are stated in the opinion of th¿ court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This, was an action of ejectment, brought' November 27, 1880, to recover possession of an- undivided half of a tract of land, and the rents and profits thereof. Both parties claimed title under David I. Field, who died in 1869. At the time of his death, he and his brother, Christopher J. Field, owned in fee simple and occupied the land as tenants in common, and were partners in the business of planting thereon. The plaintiff, who came of age within a year before bringing the action, was the only son and heir at law of David I. Field. The defendants were in possession and claimed title under a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Hazlehurst LodgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hall v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Letchford v. CaryMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Sivley v. SummersMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Summers v. BradyMississippi Supreme Court · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clay v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wilkes County v. . ForesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Pryber v. Marriott CorporationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Wilkes County v. ForesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Jordan v. BobbittMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API