Legal Opinion

County of Schuylkill v. Maurer

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1988No. Appeal, 345 Miscellaneous Docket 4PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

The County of Schuylkill (County) has taken an interlocutory appeal by permission from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County, which denied the County’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. We affirm.

Frederick Hobbs was the County solicitor from 1977 through 1983, and he was also allowed by the County to maintain a private law practice on the side. Hobbs was not supplied with office space by the County. Consequently, he performed his duties as County solicitor from his private law office on the second…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hammermill Paper Co. v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Reese v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Farber v. ENGLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RichardsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Estate of Helsel Ex Rel. Hensel v. Complete Care Services, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Higby Development, LLC v. SartorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Bullard v. Lehigh-Northampton Airport AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Murray v. ZargerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API